Author summary
79% 2 analyzed articles/videos 498 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Summer Woolley results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 306 hits . Analysis detected 1,829 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,854 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,475 of 6,628 authors). This Summer Woolley is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Summer Woolley
Author details
Total words: 1,854
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.8% percentile 4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.5% 16.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst