Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 723 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barbecues results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 333 hits . Analysis detected 2,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,238 of 16,142 topics). This Barbecues is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group. Barbecues
Topic details
Total words: 2,892
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.4% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst