Topic summary
81%2 analyzed articles/videos1,215 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bankruptcy Proceedings results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 483 hits. Analysis detected 2,985 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,645 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (9,148 of 16,562 topics). This Bankruptcy Proceedings is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Bankruptcy Proceedings
Topic details
Total words: 3,645
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos