Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,172 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Banking Sector results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 469 hits. Analysis detected 4,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (8,969 of 16,243 topics). This Banking Sector is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Banking Sector
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,688
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos