Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Banking Practices results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Bandwagon , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 372 hits . Analysis detected 3,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,447 topics). This Banking Practices is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Banking Practices
Topic details
Total words: 2,300
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 16.2% 16.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 11.2% 11.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 8.4% 8.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Bandwagon: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.9%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Tu Quoque: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst