Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,215 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Banking And Finance results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 1,232 hits. Analysis detected 3,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,645 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,585 of 15,389 topics). This Banking And Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Banking And Finance
Topic details
Total words: 3,645
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.7% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 33.8%33.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.6%10.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 33.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos