Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bahamas results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 1,756 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,620 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (14,161 of 16,562 topics). This Bahamas is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Bahamas
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,620
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510014.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Middle Ground: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos