Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Backcountry Travel results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 804 hits. Analysis detected 3,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,543 of 16,562 topics). This Backcountry Travel is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Backcountry Travel
Topic details
Total words: 4,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.6% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.0%18.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos