Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Backcountry Travel results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Loss Aversion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 804 hits . Analysis detected 3,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,543 of 16,562 topics). This Backcountry Travel is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Backcountry Travel
Topic details
Total words: 4,464
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 18.0% 18.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst