Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelly O'Mara results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Loss Aversion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 804 hits . Analysis detected 3,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,263 of 6,258 authors). This Kelly O'Mara is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Kelly O'Mara
Author details
Total words: 4,464
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.8% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 18.0% 18.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.7% 13.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 18.0%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst