Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video503 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Back Channel Diplomacy results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 44.9% saturation with 677 hits. Analysis detected 3,311 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,509 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (838 of 16,562 topics). This Back Channel Diplomacy is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group.
Back Channel Diplomacy
Topic details
Total words: 1,509
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510094.9% percentile
12.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 37.4%37.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 24.2%24.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 44.9%44.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.0%16.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.1%14.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 44.9%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 37.4%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 24.2%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos