Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Award Shows results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 102 faulty-reasoning hits from 532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,834 of 16,562 topics). This Award Shows is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Award Shows
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 532
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.8% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles532 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.5%4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos