Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Avalanche Safety results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 2,019 hits. Analysis detected 11,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,764 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,788 of 16,562 topics). This Avalanche Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Avalanche Safety
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,764
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.8%18.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.5%12.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos