Topic summary
15% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Automotive Engineering results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 634 hits . Analysis detected 5,458 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,637 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (14,274 of 16,562 topics). This Automotive Engineering is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group. Automotive Engineering
Topic details
Total words: 8,637
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst