Topic summary
15%2 analyzed articles/videos2,454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Automotive Engineering results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 634 hits. Analysis detected 5,458 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,637 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (14,274 of 16,562 topics). This Automotive Engineering is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Automotive Engineering
Topic details
Total words: 8,637
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510013.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos