Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bradley Iger results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 490 hits. Analysis detected 3,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,527 of 6,357 authors). This Bradley Iger is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Bradley Iger
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
29%Bradley Iger (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,100
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510028.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.6%9.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos