Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Automobile Crash results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35.6% saturation with 420 hits. Analysis detected 2,091 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,711 of 16,562 topics). This Automobile Crash is worse (more manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Automobile Crash
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,180
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.7% percentile
8.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 29.4%29.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 35.6%35.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.2%12.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 35.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos