Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Author Interviews results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 1,011 hits . Analysis detected 6,886 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Author Interviews is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Author Interviews
Topic details
Total words: 7,872
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst