Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video944 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austria National Football Team results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Recency Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 1,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,637 of 16,562 topics). This Austria National Football Team is better (less manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
Austria National Football Team
Topic details
Total words: 3,776
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510017.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos