Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Austin Metcalf Father Agitators Sons Killing Race results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 502 hits. Analysis detected 2,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,612 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Austin Metcalf Father Agitators Sons Killing Race is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Austin Metcalf Father Agitators Sons Killing Race
Topic details
Total words: 2,612
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.2%19.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos