Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Augusta National results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 626 hits. Analysis detected 4,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,984 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (5,795 of 15,878 topics). This Augusta National is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Augusta National
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,984
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.5% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.5%14.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.7%15.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos