Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Audits results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Hindsight Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 265 hits . Analysis detected 1,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,558 topics). This Audits is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Audits
Topic details
Total words: 1,944
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Tu Quoque: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst