Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Audiobook Debate results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 1,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (822 of 16,562 topics). This Audiobook Debate is worse (more manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group.
Audiobook Debate
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 452
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510095.0% percentile
12.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles452 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 37.0%37.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 30.5%30.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 27.6%27.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 31.0%31.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 16.6%16.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 10.6%10.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.8%8.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.5%11.5%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Topic 37.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 31.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 30.5%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos