Topic summary
⁠94%2 analyzed articles/videos806 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attorney General Nomination results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 1,002 hits. Analysis detected 7,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,728 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,550 of 16,562 topics). This Attorney General Nomination is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Attorney General Nomination
Topic details
Total words: 4,728
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.5% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.1%21.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.9%14.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos