Topic summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Atlanta City Council Meetings results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Status Quo Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 305 hits. Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,370 of 16,562 topics). This Atlanta City Council Meetings is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.
Atlanta City Council Meetings
Topic details
Total words: 2,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos