BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 856 faulty-reasoning hits from 956 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (17,867 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the article peer group.

By the time it was Matthew Cullen McClellan’s turn to comment at an Atlanta City Council meeting last week, he’d spent nearly five hours at City Hall. 
That’s because he donated his two minutes of speaking time to Housing Justice League organizing director Matthew Nursey, forcing him to stay until it was Nursey’s turn to speak. 
It used to be that public comment went in the sign-up order, but now speakers with donated time must go last, and those who donate time must stay until their time is used  due to changes made by City Council President Marci Collier Overstreet. 
“I’m fortunate that I can bring a laptop with me, and I can get work done, you know, which I did. 
But not everybody can do that,” McClellan, a Reynoldstown resident, told Atlanta Civic Circle . 
“It seems like the voices of the people that want to give their voice to someone else are kind of suppressed by them going last.” 
McClellan also said he had to pay nearly $30 for a full day’s parking because the two-hour pass he’d bought was far from sufficient. 
Councilmember Byron Amos and the Southern Center for Human Rights (SCHR) proposed several fixes at the May 18 city council meeting to make the comment period more accessible to working Atlantans: scheduling public comment right after the biweekly meeting’s 1 p.m. start time and restoring the old first-come, first-serve rule for longer comments. 
Public comment before proclamations 
Currently, Atlantans must sign up to comment before full city council meetings, which take place at 1 pm every other Monday, then wait until their name is called, which can be hours after the meeting is called to order. 
One of Amos’ resolutions would move public comment to before proclamations, which often take an hour or more. 
The other would require the council to display a timer for proclamations, which are limited to 15 minutes but often go over, and limit proclamations to four per council meeting, instead of the current five. 
If there is more than an hour of public comment, the rest would come after the proclamations. 
“It will give people some type of time frame of when they will be able to speak,” Amos said. 
“We have heard [that when] we do it after proclamations, they don’t know when they’re going to speak, and they take time off for work.” 
Amos added that using a 15-minute timer for council members to make proclamations would hold them to the same standard as the public, where a two-minute timer is displayed for each comment. 
Debate over donated time 
Kendell Long of the Southern Center for Human Rights distributed a draft ordinance called “The People’s Voice Act” to council members that takes aim at Overstreet’s new policy of bumping a speaker using donated time to the end of the line. 
People can yield their two minutes of time to another person up to 10 minutes  meaning up to five people can band together to deliver one longer remark. 
The legislation would prevent speakers who receive yielded time from having to go to the back of the line. 
It would also strike the requirement that people who donate time remain in the council chamber until their designated speaker can comment. 
“The council should be invested in encouraging people to participate in public comment, rather than curating rules that deter thoughtful public engagement with elected officials,” said Long, the Southern Center’s First Amendment policy lawyer. 
Kendell Long of the Southern Center for Human Rights encouraged the Atlanta City Council to make public comment more accessible at its May 18 meeting. 
(Credit: Alessandro Marazzi Sassoon) 
In response, Overstreet said that people who sign up with donated time can still speak individually for two minutes at their spot in the sign-up order. 
But her assertion drew murmurs of confusion from the public who  like reporters in the chamber  were unaware of that rule. 
People who’ve donated time can opt to speak themselves if they’re pressed for time, Overstreet added. 
“Everyone can have their two minutes, even if they have to leave. 
They can say, ‘I no longer want to cede my time.’” 
For Long, the issue is that people donating time should not be penalized by having to wait hours. 
Not having “to speed through very complicated issues that affect large swathes of the community  that’s the benefit of having ceded time,” he said. 
Overstreet did not return Atlanta Civic Circle ’s request for comment. 
McClellan, who spent five hours at City Hall for two minutes of speaking time, said he hopes the council embraces the proposed changes, but he’s not holding his breath. 
“I’m absolutely in support of it, and I would like to think that my city council would be in support of it too,” he said. 
Amos said he’s open to talking to the Southern Center about their proposal and views his own as a good starting point for making public comment more accessible. 
“I hope my colleagues see this as well  as a good start to begin to show some accountability and some efforts that we’re actually listening to the public,” he said. 
The council referred Amos’s resolutions to the Committee on Council, which he chairs. 
It is scheduled to meet at 11:30 am on June 1, right before the 1 pm full council meeting. 
Do you have thoughts on Atlanta City Council’s public comment procedures? 
We want to hear from you. 
Email ACC summer intern Hailey Weiner at hailey@atlantaciviccircle.org . 
The post Proposed changes could make Atlanta City Council public comment less of a time suck appeared first on Atlanta Civic Circle . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.7%Hailey Weiner: 2.1%Atlanta Civic Circle: 1.6%Confirmation Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 1.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Hailey Weiner: 3.9%Atlanta Civic Circle: 3.0%Availability Heuristic7.7%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Hailey Weiner: 5.8%Atlanta Civic Circle: 4.7%Framing Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 9.5%Hailey Weiner: 2.9%Atlanta Civic Circle: 1.1%Status Quo Bias9.5%This article: 3.0%Hailey Weiner: 1.8%Atlanta Civic Circle: 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect3.0%This article: 6.1%Hailey Weiner: 2.2%Atlanta Civic Circle: 3.1%Optimism Bias6.1%This article: 3.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.7%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.6%Pessimism Bias3.0%This article: 12.7%Hailey Weiner: 7.7%Atlanta Civic Circle: 5.3%Negativity Bias12.7%This article: 2.2%Hailey Weiner: 2.1%Atlanta Civic Circle: 3.5%Self-Serving Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 1.3%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.6%Atlanta Civic Circle: 2.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Hailey Weiner: 1.6%Atlanta Civic Circle: 1.1%Halo Effect6.8%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.7%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 1.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 1.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 2.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 1.2%Hailey Weiner: 0.3%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.2%Circular Reasoning1.2%This article: 5.0%Hailey Weiner: 3.7%Atlanta Civic Circle: 2.8%Hasty Generalization5.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.6%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.2%Hailey Weiner: 4.9%Atlanta Civic Circle: 5.1%Appeal to Emotion3.2%This article: 3.6%Hailey Weiner: 1.7%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.7%Begging the Question3.6%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.3%Hailey Weiner: 2.8%Atlanta Civic Circle: 1.8%Anecdotal5.3%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.9%Hailey Weiner: 0.9%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.9%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.0%Hailey Weiner: 1.2%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.3%Unattributed Quote5.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.7%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.4%Atlanta Civic Circle: 2.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.6%Hailey Weiner: 0.2%Atlanta Civic Circle: 1.5%Indoctrination0.6%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hailey Weiner: 0.0%Atlanta Civic Circle: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Hailey Weiner: 0.2%Atlanta Civic Circle: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.9%

956 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers46%attributed speech515writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageMatthew Cullen McClellan • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMatthew Cullen McClellan • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMatthew Cullen McClellan • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMatthew Cullen McClellan • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageByron Amos • 19 words • 0.0% coverageByron Amos • 25 words • 100.0% coverageByron Amos • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageKendell Long • 34 words • 0.0% coverageKendell Long • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMarci Collier Overstreet • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageMarci Collier Overstreet • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMarci Collier Overstreet • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMarci Collier Overstreet • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKendell Long • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKendell Long • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMatthew Cullen McClellan • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMatthew Cullen McClellan • 25 words • 0.0% coverageByron Amos • 28 words • 0.0% coverageByron Amos • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
89%flagged-word coverage
139 attributed words32% of attributed speech46% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Unattributed Quote-4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%Matthew Cullen McClellan: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Matthew Cullen McClellan: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.2 ptsWriter: 1.2%Matthew Cullen McClellan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.