Keyword summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Southern Center For Human Rights results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Status Quo Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 305 hits. Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (25,481 of 37,536 keywords). This Southern Center For Human Rights is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Southern Center For Human Rights
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510032.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos