Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Athlete Training results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 3,073 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,606 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (8,874 of 15,447 topics). This Athlete Training is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Athlete Training
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,606
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos