Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Devin Heroux results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 3,073 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,606 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,037 of 6,244 authors). This Devin Heroux is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Devin Heroux
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
52%Devin Heroux (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,606
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510051.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.9%5.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Circular Reasoning: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos