Topic summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Astrochemistry results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 1,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,407 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,835 of 16,562 topics). This Astrochemistry is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Astrochemistry
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,407
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.8% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.6%14.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos