Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Asian Economics results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 528 hits. Analysis detected 2,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,140 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,325 of 16,562 topics). This Asian Economics is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Asian Economics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,140
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.9% percentile
5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 24.7%24.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.9%14.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.6%8.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos