Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Arts Administration results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 44.5% saturation with 2,568 hits. Analysis detected 6,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,775 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Arts Administration is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Arts Administration
Topic details
Total words: 5,775
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 44.5%44.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.9%17.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 44.5%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos