Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Susan Muscarella results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 44.5% saturation with 2,568 hits . Analysis detected 6,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,775 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,360 authors). This Susan Muscarella is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Susan Muscarella
Author details
Total words: 5,775
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 44.5% 44.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 44.5%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst