Topic summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video1,667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artistic Tradition results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 310 hits. Analysis detected 2,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,001 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,861 of 16,562 topics). This Artistic Tradition is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Artistic Tradition
Topic details
Total words: 5,001
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos