Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos595 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artificial Intelligence In Healthcare results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 351 hits. Analysis detected 2,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,740 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,207 of 16,562 topics). This Artificial Intelligence In Healthcare is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Artificial Intelligence In Healthcare
Topic details
Total words: 2,740
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos