Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,194 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artificial Intelligence In Art results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 906 hits. Analysis detected 5,155 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 58% (7,025 of 16,562 topics). This Artificial Intelligence In Art is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Artificial Intelligence In Art
Topic details
Total words: 4,776
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.0%19.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 18.1%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos