Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,032 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Art Theft results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 980 hits. Analysis detected 6,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,128 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (11,301 of 16,562 topics). This Art Theft is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Art Theft
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,128
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.1%12.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos