Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Armie Hammer results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 1,566 hits. Analysis detected 9,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,122 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Armie Hammer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Armie Hammer
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,122
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos