Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,458 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Armenian Genocide Commemoration results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Halo Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3.2% saturation with 187 hits . Analysis detected 1,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 1% (16,506 of 16,562 topics). This Armenian Genocide Commemoration is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. Armenian Genocide Commemoration
Topic details
Total words: 5,832
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 0.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst