BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 1,085 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,458 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

Tucked away on a wooded hillside in the middle of San Francisco sits a big concrete cross. 
When it was built, it could be seen from miles around. 
Now, a thick grove of trees partially shields it from view. 
Over the years, Bay Curious has gotten several questions about the cross. 
Even lifelong San Franciscans, like Julia Thollaug and Phil Montalvo, have wondered about it. 
“I grew up in and around S.F. 
I’ve always noticed the cross and just wondered why it was there and where it came from?” 
says Thollaug. 
“Growing up in the Outer Mission/Crocker Amazon, the cross was always in view. 
I never understood when it was constructed, or even as of today, why it’s still up on Mount Davidson,” adds Montalvo. 
Neither of them has ever visited Mount Davidson Park, where the cross is located. 
And after living here for decades, I hadn’t either. 
Mount Davidson Park rises above a quiet residential neighborhood just west of Twin Peaks. 
It’s not well known or well marked. 
But once you start walking the park’s trails, you’re surrounded by eucalyptus trees and it’s easy to forget you’re in the middle of a major city. 
Looking to the east from the top of Mt. 
Davidson 
When you get to the top, you see two things: a view that stretches all the way to the East Bay and one very big cross. 
Author and Mount Davidson historian Jacquie Proctor says the cross’s origin story goes back to 1923. 
To a time when the area was a forest. 
“A guy named James Decatur, who is an employee of the Western Union Telegraph Company and involved with the YMCA, hikes through that forest and comes to the top,  Proctor says. 
“And he sees this incredible view of downtown. 
And he is just overwhelmed. 
He is inspired then to build a cross to crown the highest point of the city.” 
An imposing sight, the concrete cross stands 103 feet tall and measures 10 feet wide at the base. 
Decatur thought it would be a perfect place to hold an Easter sunrise service. 
Holding religious ceremonies in natural settings was a trend at the time. 
Proctor says people were pushing back against the materialism of the Roaring ’20s by reconnecting to the natural and to the spiritual. 
So it wasn’t hard for Decatur to find support for his idea. 
An article from the San Francisco Examiner, January 1923. 
Several of Mount Davidson’s trails had already been established by its landowner, a developer named A.S. 
Baldwin. 
Baldwin was already starting to build houses in the surrounding area. 
These would become neighborhoods like Westwood Highlands, Forest Hill and St. 
Francis Wood. 
Baldwin saw the service as a way to introduce more people to new neighborhoods west of Twin Peaks. 
So he not only gives Decatur permission to hold the event, but donates $2,000 to get a 40-foot tall wooden cross constructed for the service. 
That’s nearly $31,000 in today’s dollars. 
The event also received enthusiastic backing from city officials, religious leaders and community groups. 
Boy Scout troops camped out the night before and acted as ushers for attendees. 
The dean of Grace Cathedral led the service. 
That Easter morning was a rainy one, but Proctor says that didn’t stop 5,000 worshipers from showing up. 
“James Decatur thinks, ‘This is great. 
Had no idea 5,000 people would come, so let’s do it again!’ 
 Proctor says. 
Decatur raises money for a bigger wooden cross for the service the following year. 
But it wouldn’t be the last service or the last cross. 
There were five in all. 
Each temporary cross was replaced as the now annual service got more and more popular, drawing tens of thousands of people, Proctor says. 
“People are dressed up,” Proctor says. 
“They’re wearing fancy shoes and their fur coats. 
It was this incredible civic event. 
 
But it was still being held on private land, land that was beginning to fill with new houses. 
The encroaching development alarmed nature lover Madie Brown. 
In 1926, she led a campaign to urge the city to buy 25 acres on Mount Davidson to create a public park. 
Bolstered by women’s groups across the city, the three-year campaign was a success. 
She even won the support of Baldwin’s widow, Emma, who donated the six acres at the peak. 
The cross would now be sitting on public land. 
Thousands of worshippers climbed to the top of Mount Davidson for the sunrise service in 1930. 
After years of temporary crosses, construction began on the monument in 1932. 
It took two years and $20,000 to build the enormous concrete cross  almost $400,000 in today’s dollars. 
By the time it was completed, the country was in The Great Depression. 
But the people still wanted a grand celebration. 
As part of the ceremony, a dozen 1,000-watt flood lights were installed on poles surrounding the cross. 
Madie Brown envisioned a dramatic moment when the lights would be switched on for the first time. 
She wrote to an envoy of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt asking him to do the honors. 
“It seems most appropriate that the President, who has brought light into many a darkened American home and who through his New Deal has instilled the principles of the Golden Rule into American business, should take part in this cross lighting ceremony,” she wrote. 
Western Union donates their time and their telegraph lines to set up a coast-to-coast hookup between Washington, D.C., and San Francisco. 
And on the evening of March 24, 1934, President Roosevelt pressed a gold telegraph key that sent electricity across the country to light the Mount Davidson cross. 
Once lit, the cross was visible from 50 miles away. 
That Easter, 50,000 people journeyed to the monument. 
The Mount Davidson cross nears completion in 1934. 
The cross became a San Francisco landmark. 
But other than an appearance in the Clint Eastwood movie, “Dirty Harry” in 1971, it had largely stayed out of the news until the early 1990s, when the issue of a cross on public land ends up in court. 
After several years of litigation, the 9th U.S. 
Circuit Court of Appeals rules that city ownership of the cross violates the California Constitution’s separation of church and state laws. 
San Francisco has to find someone to buy the cross or tear it down. 
“The city decides they’re going to sell the land around the cross and the cross and they have to sell it with no conditions,” says Proctor. 
In 1997, San Francisco settles on a plan to auction off the cross and the little over a third of an acre it sits on. 
The sale requires any bidder to keep the site open to the public and places restrictions on how many days it can be illuminated. 
Three groups come forward in hopes of preserving the cross as a landmark: The Friends of Mount Davidson Conservancy (of which Jacquie Proctor was a member), the Museum of the City of San Francisco and the Council of Armenian American Organizations of Northern California. 
The Armenian group thought that the cross could become a memorial. 
“Most Armenian Americans, including those in the San Francisco Bay Area, are descendants of the few survivors of the Armenian genocide, which was carried out by the Turkish leaders of the Ottoman Empire in 1915,” says Roxanne Makasdjian, a member of Council of Armenian American Organizations of Northern California. 
Makasdjian says that descendants often built two things in the places where they settled: churches and genocide memorials. 
The Armenian Council thought a visible symbol like the cross on Mount Davidson could educate the public about this history. 
With the support of the neighborhood group, who share the goals of preserving the cross and the park, Makasdjian’s group wins the rights to buy the site and the cross for $26,000. 
A plaque at the base of the Mount Davidson Cross marks Armenian Genocide Commemoration Day. 
Now, the cross is lit two nights a year, April 24 to commemorate the Armenian genocide and the night before Easter. 
The annual sunrise service still exists. 
Now it’s non-denominational, and a few hundred people usually show up. 
Not quite the same scene as the thousands who appeared in their finery in the 1920s and 1930s. 
But Proctor is thankful for the sunrise service. 
Without it, she says, Mount Davidson would look very different today. 
“If we didn’t have the sunrise service, we wouldn’t have a park there now. 
And it would have been covered with houses and buildings, like most of the other hills of San Francisco.” 
In 2020, the coronavirus pandemic canceled the Easter service for the first time since 1923. 
And this year will be the second time. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.0%Suzie Racho: 2.2%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Suzie Racho: 0.6%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic1.0%This article: 1.4%Suzie Racho: 0.6%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic1.4%This article: 0.8%Suzie Racho: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 1.7%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Suzie Racho: 1.4%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect4.8%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.9%Suzie Racho: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Suzie Racho: 1.6%CalMatters: 3.5%Optimism Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.3%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Suzie Racho: 1.1%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias1.2%This article: 3.0%Suzie Racho: 0.8%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias3.0%This article: 1.2%Suzie Racho: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error1.2%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Suzie Racho: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias4.3%This article: 1.2%Suzie Racho: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.2%This article: 2.2%Suzie Racho: 1.1%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Suzie Racho: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.9%Suzie Racho: 2.1%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority7.9%This article: 1.0%Suzie Racho: 0.4%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma1.0%This article: 1.0%Suzie Racho: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope1.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.0%Suzie Racho: 3.3%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization8.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.4%Suzie Racho: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon2.4%This article: 3.8%Suzie Racho: 2.4%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion3.8%This article: 3.0%Suzie Racho: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question3.0%This article: 9.5%Suzie Racho: 2.9%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.5%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.8%Suzie Racho: 3.2%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal0.8%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.8%Suzie Racho: 0.5%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.8%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.0%Suzie Racho: 1.1%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice3.0%This article: 3.0%Suzie Racho: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination3.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Suzie Racho: 0.9%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1458 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers26%attributed speech1,072writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJulia Thollaug • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJulia Thollaug • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coveragePhil Montalvo • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePhil Montalvo • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMadie Brown • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRoxanne Makasdjian • 49 words • 0.0% coverageRoxanne Makasdjian • 18 words • 0.0% coverageCouncil of Armenian American Organizations of Northern California • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJacquie Proctor • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Madie Brown

100%flagged-word coverage
44 attributed words11% of attributed speech41% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Madie Brown: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Madie Brown: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.