Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,025 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Archaeological Excavation results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 475 hits. Analysis detected 2,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (12,013 of 16,562 topics). This Archaeological Excavation is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Archaeological Excavation
Topic details
Total words: 4,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos