Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arbitration results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 682 hits. Analysis detected 2,927 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,341 of 16,562 topics). This Arbitration is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Arbitration
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,252
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 30.3%30.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos