Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video681 analyzed words
BS Summary: These April Cpi Inflation Report Shows Prices Going Higher results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 701 hits. Analysis detected 3,306 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,606 of 16,562 topics). This April Cpi Inflation Report Shows Prices Going Higher is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
April Cpi Inflation Report Shows Prices Going Higher
Topic details
Total words: 2,724
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.2% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.0%11.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.7%25.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.0%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos