Topic summary
69%2 analyzed articles/videos2,782 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apprenticeship Programs results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 879 hits. Analysis detected 6,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,346 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,525 of 16,562 topics). This Apprenticeship Programs is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Apprenticeship Programs
Topic details
Total words: 8,346
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.5%10.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Red Herring: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate