Topic summary
69% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,782 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apprenticeship Programs results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 879 hits . Analysis detected 6,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,346 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,525 of 16,562 topics). This Apprenticeship Programs is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Apprenticeship Programs
Topic details
Total words: 8,346
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 10.5% 10.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Red Herring: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst