Topic summary
39% 3 analyzed articles/videos 616 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apple Watch results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Availability Heuristic , and Halo Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 620 hits . Analysis detected 3,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,884 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,609 of 16,562 topics). This Apple Watch is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group. Apple Watch
Topic details
Total words: 3,884
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.1% percentile 3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst