Topic summary
39%3 analyzed articles/videos616 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apple Watch results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 620 hits. Analysis detected 3,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,884 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,609 of 16,562 topics). This Apple Watch is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Apple Watch
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,884
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.1% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate