Topic summary
⁠97%2 analyzed articles/videos389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apple Pricing results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 471 hits. Analysis detected 3,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,322 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,939 of 16,562 topics). This Apple Pricing is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Apple Pricing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,322
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
5.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 20.3%20.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.6%11.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.1%13.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos