Topic summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 606 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apple One results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 438 hits . Analysis detected 1,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,818 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (5,674 of 16,559 topics). This Apple One is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Apple One
Topic details
Total words: 1,818
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.7% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 24.1% 24.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst