Topic summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video763 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apple Maps results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Bandwagon, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,848 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,289 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,060 of 15,400 topics). This Apple Maps is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Apple Maps
Topic details
Total words: 2,289
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 5.1%5.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos