Topic summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video877 analyzed words
BS Summary: These App Review results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,517 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,631 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,983 of 16,562 topics). This App Review is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
App Review
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,631
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos