Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apologies In Politics results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 53.8% saturation with 2,604 hits . Analysis detected 9,895 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 81% (3,253 of 16,562 topics). This Apologies In Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Apologies In Politics
Topic details
Total words: 4,840
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.4% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 53.8% 53.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 22.5% 22.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 53.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst