Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 250 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antitrust Case results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 98 hits . Analysis detected 581 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,287 of 16,562 topics). This Antitrust Case is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Antitrust Case
Topic details
Total words: 1,000
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.0% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Tu Quoque: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst