Jury starts deliberating states’ claim that Live Nation has a monopoly on concerts and ticketing 17%

4/10/2026, 9:04:17 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 271 faulty-reasoning hits from 250 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.7% and a BS Rank of 17% (18,214 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the article peer group.

Updated 8:37 AM PDT, April 10, 2026 
Michael Rapino, left, chief executive officer and president of Live Nation Entertainment Inc., arrives at Manhattan Federal court, Thursday, March 19, 2026 in New York. 
(AP Photo/Adam Gray) 
NEW YORK (AP)  Jury deliberations began Friday in an antitrust case pitting 34 states against the concert giant Live Nation Entertainment. 
The states argue in the civil case that the company and its ticketing arm, Ticketmaster, are monopolizing the industry and driving up prices to see live music. 
Live Nation contends there is more competition than ever and the company plays fair amid a U.S. booming concert business. 
Soon after starting deliberations the jury in Manhattan federal court told the judge it wanted to review certain testimony given at the five-week trial. 
The states carried on with their case after the federal government settled last month. 
The Justice Department said it had won important concessions from Live Nation, particularly in the sale of tickets at dozens of the company’s amphitheaters. 
A lawyer for the states said in closing arguments on Thursday that Live Nation controls 86% of the market for concerts and 73% of the overall market when sports events are included. 
Live Nation’s lawyer said the company isn’t hiding from the fact that it’s the biggest entertainment company and ticketer in the country. 
But, the lawyer said, “success is not against the antitrust laws in the United States.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.8%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias10.8%This article: 12.8%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias12.8%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect6.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.0%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias8.8%This article: 9.6%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 6.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.8%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization10.8%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 6.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question6.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 8.8%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque8.8%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.0%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.0%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection6.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

250 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers42%attributed speech144writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Rapino • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageLive Nation • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJustice Department • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageLive Nation • 22 words • 0.0% coverageLive Nation • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Live Nation

100%flagged-word coverage
57 attributed words54% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Quote-first Misdirection+26.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Live Nation: 26.3%26.3%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.